2025 ITL Symposium: Thoughts from a G5 GM

This morning, we welcomed 11 Power 4 GMs as panelists for the 2025 Vestible ITL Symposium Presented by Mascot Alliance and Powered by Dropback. Before an audience of about 300 members of the college and pro football community, they provided insights on the industry over a 90-minute period.

However, there was one thing missing — the thoughts of an equivalent member from a school competing in the Group of Five conferences. For that, we enlisted Jose Jefferson, who’s not only the co-founder of the College Gridiron Showcase but also the newly minted GM at Florida International University in Miami.

Here’s what Jose provided earlier this week regarding some of the hot topics in the college football business.

  • What is the role and job description of the college GM?: “I think that varies with every GM role.   Everyone does it differently. I think it is based on your relationship with the head coach.  It involves managing the roster, managing NIL revenue, managing the recruiting process and evaluating the current roster vs incoming players. In short, if your team is good, it is your job to make the team better.  If you are great, it is your job to make the team exceptional. If you are exceptional, it is your job to keep the team exceptional and in front of the curve.”
  • There’s been a trend of NFL scouts moving to executive roles in the college ranks.  Will this continue? “I think as the position evolves, there will be a trend of making college football front offices like NFL front offices. I think there is a learning curve; the evaluation process may differ as most of these players are not developed. There have been several players who are Hall Of Famers who weren’t recruited out of high school or who weren’t three-star prospects. I think if you are organized, flexible, and creative with your process, yes, NFL scouts would be great candidates for GM roles.”
  • Do you see a day when colleges have NFL-style scouting staffs, or will coaches remain as the chief evaluators? “Coaches want to be scouts and scouts want to be coaches (ha ha). In the college game, I feel coaches will still be the main evaluators. Until they create an NFL-style draft, college is all about relationships. Now it is getting less that way as ‘bags’ are being dropped off and things seem more transactional. However, the relationship has to start with who the player will be working with; who he will be mentored by; and who he’s developing with. So yes, I feel coaches are still the front line. It is the GM’s job to take a deeper dive with their selections and make sure a player is a ‘fit’ with the team, the culture, and scheme.” 

For a closer look at today’s event in Indianapolis, make sure to check out the Friday Wrap this week, in which we recap all the award winners from Wednesday and the panelists’ responses this morning. Not registered? Fix that here.

The College GM: Five Big Questions

In a week, more than 20 college general managers and directors of player personnel, most of them from Power 4 conferences, will convene in Indianapolis for the Vestible ITL Symposium Presented by Mascot Alliance. They won’t be alone, of course: we’ve also got about a dozen major NIL agencies (some NFLPA-certified, some soon to be), 10-12 NFL scouts, and lots of other members of the sports business community on their way to Room 205-206 of the Indiana Convention Center Friday morning.

We’ll be there to network, of course, but also to talk about the issues. As many benefits as the transfer portal and the NIL era have been for college football — and I strongly believe it’s been a net positive — there have also been a lot of negatives and even abuses. That’s what our panelists will be discussing.

The exact panelists and the schools that will be represented will be in today’s Friday Wrap, as well as the symposium registration link if you’d like to join us (but hurry, because we’re almost at capacity). You can register for the Friday Wrap, if you don’t already receive it, here.

So what will be the topics? There won’t be topics as much as there will be questions. My counterpart for this symposium, C.J. Cavazos of CJ Recruiting and NIL, will co-host the event, alternating asking questions to the panelists.

We’ve got a list of 18 questions we’re going to try to get to during the 90 minutes we’ve got scheduled. Here are five of them.

  • What is the role and job description of the modern college GM?: We’re seeing an avalanche of hirings at the GM level, especially in P4 football. Despite this, there seems to be no consensus on what a college GM actually is. Is he primarily an evaluator? More of a capologist? Does he have the authority to hire and fire, to build a roster?
  • Will the trend of NFL scouts and executives moving from the NFL to the college ranks continue?: What are the people who are running college personnel departments looking for? On the college level, coaches more or less function as the team’s scouts (along with several volunteers who are usually students). Will we see the “professionalization” of player evaluation in college football?
  • One of the most common complaints in portal-related matters is tampering, i.e., open recruiting of another team’s players, often in-season, often by coaches on another team. Is there any way to stop this? : This is the one topic that unites coaches and personnel types, especially when it comes to G5 teams that are often picked over by P4 schools.
  • Should there be any restrictions on the number of times a player can transfer?: I know this could be a controversial idea, but how much is enough? Wouldn’t some reasonable standard improve the game? Is stability a dirty word now?
  • What’s the biggest immediate change in the portal if the House settlement is approved in April?: All I’ve heard is that most teams and agents are trying to front-load their agreements signed in December because of the uncertainty of the portal beyond April. Studying the settlement is part of the job for modern college GMs. What have they found?

If these questions intrigue you, you should see the entire list of 18 we’ve come up with. We’ll publish all of them in the Friday Wrap this evening. Make sure to check it out (register here for our newsletter) , and if you’d like to listen in on experts talking about these matters, I hope you’ll join us in a week. The registration link for Friday’s symposium will also be in the Wrap. See you at the convention center.

Which New GM Has the Best Chances of Success Quickly?

Your turn to play GM. Given the following, who would you want to be? Mike Borgonzi (Titans), John Spytek (Raiders), Darren Mougey (Jets) or the to-be-named Jacksonville GM? 

TITANS (3-14)

  • Day 1: Tennessee “earned” the top pick.
  • Picks: 8 (a first, a second, two fourths, two fifths, a sixth and a seventh)
  • Head coach: Brian Callahan enters Year 2; it’s hard to judge him, given the hand he’s been dealt.
  • QBs in 2024: Neither Will Levis or Mason Rudolph (who’s a free agent) would be the starter next season in a perfect world.
  • Division: The Texans went two rounds into the playoffs. The Colts barely missed the playoffs, and the Jaguars fired both their head coach and GM. The Texans probably bounce back next season, but the Colts are a question mark unless QB Anthony Richardson takes a big leap forward.

RAIDERS (4-13)

  • Day 1: Las Vegas has the sixth pick.
  • Picks: 10 (a first, a second, two thirds, a fourth, a fifth, three sixths and a seventh)
  • Head coach: Pete Carroll is a youthful 73, and has a history of success.
  • QBs in 2024: None of Gardner Minshew, Desmond Ridder or Aidan O’Donnell were the answer. 
  • Division: Stacked. The Chiefs went to the Super Bowl, and the Chargers (11-6) and Broncos (10-7) both made the playoffs. Plus, all three have QBs who are in their respective primes, or on the rise.

JAGUARS (4-13)

  • Day 1: Jacksonville holds the fifth pick in the draft.
  • Picks: 10 (a first, a second, two thirds, two fourths, a fifth, two sixths and a seventh)
  • Head coach: Liam Coen arrives fresh off his success in Tampa Bay, but the bigger issue is that, with Executive VP of Football Operations Tony Boselli around, the new GM will have to fight to be heard.
  • QB in 2024: Though he finished the season on injured reserve, the team has Trevor Lawrence on an extended deal. He probably hasn’t been the QB everyone thought he would be, but he’s clearly the class of these four teams. 
  • Division: As discussed earlier, the Titans are in turmoil and the Colts are unsettled under center, though the Texans underplayed in 2024 and should be better next season.

JETS (5-12)

  • Day 1: New York holds the seventh pick in the draft. 
  • Picks: Eight (a first, a second, a third, a fourth, two fifths and two sixths, but no seventh)
  • Head coach: Aaron Glenn comes to New York hoping to recreate the magic he was part of in Detroit.
  • QB in 2024: The Jets just cut their starter, Aaron Rodgers
  • Division: The Bills are among the best teams in the NFL. However, the Patriots are still a ways away and the Dolphins underachieved in 2024.  

Which one would you choose? Not an easy choice. To me, Spytek has the hardest job given his division. The command situation gives me pause in Jacksonville, despite having Lawrence around. That leaves the Jets and Titans. I think I lean toward the Jets given the promise of Glenn, along with three picks in the top 100 vs. just two for Tennessee. Tough call, though. 

Getting to Know New Jets GM Darren Mougey

With pieces on new GMs Mike Borgonzi (Tennessee) and John Spytek (Las Vegas) completed the last two weeks, we turned to Darren Mougey, who’s taken over the same role with the Jets. It was easy to get takes (all of them positive) on Mougey, who’s been aggressively reshaping New York’s front office in his first few weeks on the job.

Here’s what his colleagues said about “Moug” this week:

  • “Really very smart. That’s one thing that really stands out, and he’s a good person. These guys are kinda hard to find sometimes, that have the personality and also a football mind. I knew right off the bat he’d be where he is, because I’ve been around so many GMs. I think he encompasses what you need in a GM. First of all, he’s a good guy to keep things together, he’s fair, he’s a pleasant guy, and he’s all football. Very likeable. He doesn’t say much, he’s kinda on the quite side, but he’s all football and he’ll definitely make the Jets a better program.” 
  • “Moug, as he is known across the League, is highly respected among scouts and coaches. He is an incredible evaluator with many years of experience scouting and playing. He is extremely detail-oriented, efficient and organized, and uses a very thorough process in all of his work. His leadership traits will make him a great GM and he has the personality to click with anyone and everyone. (I) have no doubt that he will be very successful in this next step of his career leading the Jets.”
  • “Always a good day to do a school call with Moug. Really sharp, good evaluator, has strong opinions on players, always positive with school staffs, easy guy to connect with. He’s always willing to help out another scout if they needed anything. Never afraid to roll up his sleeves to get a job done.”
  • “If you know Moug, no one is surprised he got the job. He’s a great person that is detailed and never afraid of the work that needs to get done. But what really separates Moug is he is really good person and he truly loves the game of football.
    Working with him for (almost a decade), you could always trust that the work would get done with Moug, and he is fun to just sit down and talk ball with because he  has the confidence to answer questions but still has a low ego.” 
  • “I would say that he is extremely bright, very smart, and has a good eye for talent. He is (also) very adaptable from the standpoint of being able to relate with different types of people, and I think that stems from just his experience in football and sports and being around just different guys in the locker room. So he’s very relatable. People gravitate towards him. Great personality. I would also say that he’s somebody that I think would be a collaborative type of guy where he would take input from different people and respect that, but yet at the very end of the day would be the guy that would make the decision . . . he does not come across to me as like an authoritarian-type leader where you know it’s his way and not really taking a lot of input. I could just see him being like a guy that would encourage that kind of culture, a collaborative culture . . . I think he’s gonna do really well in the job. I think he’s a guy that’s gonna be decisive when it comes to . . . making decisions. It looks like he and (head coach Aaron Glenn) are putting together a pretty nice coaching staff, a nice mix of young guys and veteran guys, so . . . I think he’s gonna do a really good job in New York. I’m excited for him, for sure.”

Before we go, a fun fact: the 2015 Broncos scouting staff featured Assistant Director of College Scouting Adam Peters, National Scout John Spytek, and Mougey, who was then an area scout covering the Southwest. Within 10 years, all three of them would ascend to the GM chair with NFL teams. 

Want to learn which other teams are “breeding” future GMs? Make sure you’re reading the Friday Wrap, which comes out Fridays (duh) at 7:30 p.m. EST. Register for it here.

Getting to Know New Raiders GM John Spytek

When a new GM takes over, we try to get a feel for his personality and leadership style by asking those who know him, anonymously, to give us their respective takes. We’ve done that previously this cycle with Tennessee’s Mike Borgonzi, and in previous years with other hires. This week, our focus turns to new Raiders chief John Spytek, and despite perhaps the busiest week of the year when it comes to all-star play, we had several responses.

Before we get started, my own experience with John has been A+. I dealt with him when his Bucs won the 2020 Best Draft Award (the Wirfs/Winfield draft), and it seemed to me like Bucs GM Jason Licht wanted John to handle much of it, mainly because Jason believed in his work. Both Jason and John were professional and humbled, even though we had to work with really weird conditions (that year, the combine was canceled, so it was the only online ITL Seminar we’ve ever conducted). Check it out here, if you’re interested. You’ll hear John discuss the vagaries of having a draft from home, which I think is pretty interesting. 

But that’s enough from me. One source I reached in Mobile said the Raiders made a great choice because he’s “a hands-off manager” who “never micromanages” and “trusts them to do their jobs.” He also truly values what his scouts tell him, my friend told me.

Here are some other comments from people who’ve worked alongside John.

  • “Unique, avant-garde leadership approach. Not a micro manager. Will build through the draft and collect pieces in free agency.”
  • “He’s a very good listener. His door is always open to come in and talk about any concerns you may have. He does a good job stepping back and looking at the big picture. He’s strong in his convictions. He does a good job articulating what he sees.”
  • “John is a really good overall person and you know what you are getting with him each day, as he always has the same positive demeanor. He’s very appreciative and loyal to those around him. A very good evaluator who sees the big picture for players and what roles they can bring.”  

Given the nature of his leadership, based on what we were told about him, we’d expect him to make sure the Raiders staff has plenty of strong evaluators who can do their jobs without a lot of oversight. Generally speaking, that sounds like he’ll value veterans over the youth-is-king trend currently in fashion with a lot of teams. The Raiders did pretty good last April (they narrowly missed being a finalist for the Best Draft Award) and have plenty of holdovers from the previous regime that have lots of seasoning. That gives Spytek a real boost as he takes over and learns his staff. 

For more about front offices, hiring and the NFL offseason, make sure to read the Friday Wrap, which comes out this evening. You can register for it here.

 

 

Getting to Know New Titans GM Mike Borgonzi

At Inside the League, we try to partner with the scouts, executives and administrators who do the evaluation of NFL players, both on their way up and while they’re in the league. Part of that is keeping a close eye on what’s going on in NFL front offices, especially when it comes to the GM seat.

We’ve previously polled our sources on NFL staffs about previous GM hires (here’s our report on Arizona’s Monti Ossenfort and Tennessee’s Ran Carthon, here’s our report on former Raiders GM Dave Ziegler, and here’s our post on the three GMs hired prior to the 2022 season), and with a new face in Tennessee, we asked around about new Titans GM Mike Borgonzi. The response was overwhelming and immediate, and he comes back as a little reserved but even-tempered, progressive when he needs to be, and hard-working. Here’s what people who’ve worked with him told us. 

  • “Mike Borgonzi has a high academic and football IQ, as you might expect from a Brown University graduate. (He’s) relatively calm and reserved, but has a feel for reading a scout’s view and separating facts from opinions. Has a scout’s eye when identifying a players traits but utilizes analytics to compliment, support, or confirm.”
  • “Nice guy. Pro (scouting) history, has never done college. Collaboration guy from the (former Packers GM) Ron Wolf system. Middle-of-the-road type dude. Speaks when spoken to type, with a small circle.”
  • “A grinder from the bottom up. Really worked and matured each step he made up the later. Respected and listened to inside the building. More (aligned with) traditional scouting. He’s a trust-his-gut (guy), but not afraid to be collaborative. I’d classify him as more introverted, but he will open up.” 
  • Borgo as a person is very soft-spoken. In (almost two decades) working with him, I don’t think I ever heard him raise his voice to anyone. Really good person. (Also,) a great family man. Somewhat of an introvert with a close and small circle of friends. Old-school in his eval process, but does listen to analytics to a point. Really listens and trust his scouting/personnel department and will collaborate with them.”
  • “Mike is a highly detailed evaluator. Sees the big picture from a team-building standpoint, and has a clear vision on what plays at high levels in the NFL for each position. Has an old school, come-to-work mindset, but has a great grasp and feel for integrating the new trends in analytics/player tracking, etc. Is collaborative in getting a full grasp of what other scouts see and listens, but has his view as an evaluator. He is probably a blend of both old and new age scouting, and is a great communicator throughout the entire building. Will be a great partner for the head coach and assistant coaches.” 
  • “I would acknowledge how impressed I have been with him and his growth as a professional over the last decade. I’ve known him to be someone that is curious and approachable, as well a leader that recognizes that this is a people business first. He and I have had many conversations over the years around optimizing process and procedure and placing a premium on context when it comes to informed decision-making. I appreciate the tactical application to a well-vetted strategy has been a consistent element of our discussions.”

  • “Mike is a great person. He is smart and hard-working. He will be a great leader because he will set the standard, allow his people to work, and value their input. He ascended the right way, was authentic, and was not a self-promoter, just a good worker that took the right steps.”

  • “Mike is a high-level evaluator. On top of that, he is a relationship-builder. Guys will want to show up and work for him. I imagine he will implement a similar collaborative model like he had in KC. Mike has a lot of experience and knows what plays on a 53-man roster. I expect him to have success in Tennessee.”

Scouting the League Podcast: 10 More Questions for Nick Underhill

If you’re passionate about the New Orleans Saints, stop reading this now and listen to this week’s Scouting the League Podcast. Rodrik and I welcomed Nick Underhill of NewOrleans.Football, the leading service for Saints information, in my opinion. Nick and his team (including another longtime Saints beat writer, Jeff Triplett) have revolutionized how to cover an NFL team. It’s well worth the $89 annual subscription if you’re part of the Who Dat Nation. 

Anyway, we didn’t pull any punches with Nick and asked him to go on the record with his thoughts about how the team has been managed and coached, as well as his thoughts on who should be the next coach, the fate of several key Saints and other related topics. We don’t have beat writers on the podcast often, so when we do, we try to squeeze every ounce of information out of them that we can, as we’ve previously done with Fran Duffy (who covers the Eagles), Aaron Wilson (Texans), Ben Standig (Commanders) and others. As always, we’re not afraid to cover the tough topics, but if you’re looking for a podcast that rips into owners, executives and players, look elsewhere. 

Our hour with Nick felt more like ten minutes, and when we finished, I felt like I had a lot more questions I’d like to ask. Here are a few of them.

  • What position do the Saints address first in the draft?
  • You said you’ve “never seen (the fanbase) the way it is now.” Would Saints fans withstand a “get well” year with Spencer Rattler as the starter? What if it dragged into two years of real bottom-dwelling?
  • If Loomis had retired, would the team have stayed in the building for his replacement?
  • The team has always been aggressive about trading up. Do you expect that philosophy to change now that there are so many holes? Will the team ever have a “load up on picks” philosophy?
  • Cam Jordan didn’t seem to be on the same page with the team last offseason, losing weight to gain quickness, then being used inside at defensive tackle. What does this say about the organization? Was it more of a Dennis Allen situation?
  • Does Taysom Hill return?
  • Could Jon Gruden have fixed things?
  • What’s the first thing you’d do to fix the offensive line? The defensive line? 
  • Regardless of whether they keep or cut Derek Carr, should the Saints draft a QB in the first 100 picks? 
  • Is there even a comp for the current Saints, as they have a disastrous cap situation, a very old team, and a question mark at QB? Can you think of a team in recent history who came back from such a situation, and how long did it take? 

Hey, maybe we’ll bring Nick back and ask all these questions. But for now, one hour is all we had, and if you are interested in team-building in general and the Saints in particular, I encourage you to check out the podcast, as well as some of our other episodes. I think you’ll enjoy them. 

You’ll also enjoy our newsletter, which comes out Fridays at 7:30 p.m. EST. Register for it here.

CGSU 2025: A First Look at a Unique Opportunity for Aspiring NFL Scouts

I’m really excited about our 14-man class at the CGSU, the scout school we hold annually at the College Gridiron Showcase. The class is the brainchild of CGS co-founder Jose Jefferson, and this is our fourth class (here’s our first).

The participants come from all around and have had excellent attitudes, which is extremely impressive given the travel challenges everyone faced getting here (as well as the scheduling challenges since they arrived). Here are a few notes on what’s happened so far, and what’s ahead. 

  • Last night, co-founder Jose Jefferson welcomed everyone with 15 minutes on the game, where they fit in, and how they could achieve their goals. When Jose speaks, I listen, and part of the reason is because it’s always entertaining. If you don’t believe me, listen (again?) to the Scouting the League Podcast when he was a guest.
  • After that, former Chiefs scout and current and current CFL scout John Bonaventura, who leads the program, gave a detailed discussion on the life of a scout, from travel to building relationships to getting your foot in the door. John had some good stories from his time in both leagues. 
  • Today, some of the 15 CGSU participants (two are still in transit as I write this) will head across town to assist with our workout for street free agents. They’ll be recording times and helping out as we conduct testing in Carrollton, about a half-hour from here. We had no problem getting volunteers, which speaks to their attitudes. 
  • By the way, we have participants from as far away as Buffalo, NY; Salt Lake City; Newark, Del.; Nashville; Chicago; Columbus, Ohio; and even the state of Washington. These are not people who drove over from somewhere in the Metroplex. Again, that impresses me.
  • Among our success stories: Browns scouting assistants Hajriz Aliu and Tyler Habursky, Air Force Director of Football Operations Joe Caulfield, Memphis DPP Blake Moore, Michigan State Assistant Director of Scouting Syrus Amirian, Georgia personnel analyst Sales Pinckney and many others.
  • Another thing about this week: they’re already knitting together, feeling comfortable with everyone and learning each others’ names. That’s one of the cool things about this. They’re making friends that will help them in their careers. 
  • We’ve got 164 scouts registered to join us here this weekend. Are all of them NFL scouts? No (though the overwhelming majority are). Will some scouts stay home, given the cold, wet conditions in Fort Worth today? Maybe. Still, we’ve got football happening in a big way this weekend, and there will be dozens of helpful (and perhaps career-making) connections made over the next 72 hours. If you want to work in football, you simply have to go where it’s being played. Everyone at CGSU bet on themselves, and I think it’s gonna pay off.
  • There are 190 players inbound to Fort Worth today. Our guys will be ready. The big opportunity will come Saturday afternoon, when we have our (kinda famous) interview session from 3:30-10:30 p.m. tomorrow night. It will look a little like the floor of the New York Stock Exchange as our CGSU members facilitate interviews and serve as runners for NFL teams. It is, without question, the best way to get face time (and prove your value) to NFL scouts without actually working for a team. It’s one of the things I’m most proud of with respect to what we do here.

If you aspire to be a scout someday, put it on your calendar for next year. I assure you it’s worth it. 

Best Draft Award 2024: Who Are the Contenders?

On Friday, we’ll kick off voting for the Best Draft Award for 2024. It will be the eighth year we’ve presented the award (in order, the Saints, Colts, 49ers, Bucs, Broncos, Seahawks and Lions have won it, going back to the 2017 trophy), and it’s usually a tight vote.

While we at Inside the League don’t have a vote — only active NFL scouts get one — we do have to determine the finalists, and that’s not an easy task. It’s a cliche, but even getting selected as a finalist is a big deal, and we always go back and forth on the best five teams (we even took more than five finalists in 2021 and 2024).

Anyway, our job now is to determine which five teams did best last April, and we’re struggling with the choices. Here are 12 teams that we think have a pretty strong case, along with their best picks/UDFA signings.

Who should we pick? Obviously, there are some pretty strong choices here. It’s something we take seriously; we’d never want to omit a team that might have a case for winning it.

49ers Puni, Dominick (3/86) Mustapha, Malik (4/124) Guerendo, Isaac (4/129)
Buccaneers Barton, Graham (1/26) Smith, Tykee (3/89) Irving, Bucky (4/125)
Chargers Alt, Joe (1/5) McConkey, Ladd (2/34) Still, Tarheeb (5/137)
Colts Latu, Laiatu (1/15) Goncalves, Matt (3/79) Bortolini, Tanor (4/117)
Commanders Daniels, Jayden (1/2) Sainristil, Mike (2/50)  
Eagles Mitchell, Quinyon (1/22) DeJean, Cooper (2/40)  
Giants Nabers, Malik (1/6) Nubin, Tyler (2/47) Phillips, Dru (3/70)
Packers Morgan, Jordan (1/25) Cooper, Edgerrin (2/45) Bullard, Javon (2/58)
Panthers Legette, Xavier (1/32) Wallace, Trevin (3/72) Sanders, Ja’Tavion (4/101)
Raiders Bowers, Brock (1/13) Powers-Johnson, Jackson (2/44)  
Rams Verse, Jared (1/19) Fiske, Braden (2/39) Kinchens, Kam (3/99)
Steelers Frazier, Zach (2/51) Wilson, Payton (3/98) McCormick, Mason (4/119)

The conflict I struggle with every year is figuring out what’s better: one or two true impact players, or several players that contribute? My impression is that scouts value really hitting on Day 1 and Day 2, based on previous voting, though the award has been a funny thing. For example, the Jets had both the OROY (WO Garrett Wilson) and the DROY (DC Ahmad Gardner) in the 2022 draft, yet the Seahawks (who drafted starters at both tackle positions plus OH Kenneth Walker and DC Tariq Woolen) took home the trophy.

DMs are open at @insidetheleague. To find out who we chose, check out tomorrow’s Friday Wrap. If you aren’t registered yet, do that here.

December 2024 Portal Window: Reactions

Earlier this week, an old friend in player representation made an offhand comment about representing a player in the transfer portal. This is an agent who’s one of the top handful of contract negotiators in the game, but who’s become disillusioned by the cost of repping today’s players. It was refreshing to hear that he had entered NIL representation, because he’s been renewed. The story he told me sounded like a win for all involved — team, player and agent — and I don’t often get to hear such good news.

Curious if there were other positive stories out there, I reached out to several friends on both side of the portal (player representation and personnel/recruiting) to get their takes on the December window. Here’s what I was told.

DPP, G5 school: “There were a lot more players that entered (close to a few thousand in just the first day) and every one of them has an agent and is asking for a lot more money than in years past. It’s impossible to set a market and average price per player when average talented kids are getting offered more money than you think they’re worth. You also see certain schools like Oklahoma State going all in on NIL and portal when they weren’t before, I guess in an effort to save their jobs and bring back a winning culture.”

DPP, another G5 school: “For us, it wasn’t too crazy. We had minimal interaction and impact from agents or advisors and we didn’t get into the bidding war type of deal. We did offer reasonable but moderate amounts of NIL money to guys we anticipate having good opportunities to start for us, but our top guys on our roster are and will continue to get the bulk of, and the highest amounts of, the NIL budget. . . With that said, from what I’ve seen and heard from the portal market is pretty rough. We have always had a problem in college football of handler/street agent types taking advantage of players, and it’s only worse now with the combination of the transfer portal and NIL. There is a significant need in college football for some type of regulations in the ‘agent’ world. It will take time, but there’s a very real need for that. We’ve heard of multiple situations of ‘agents’ gathering the potential market value for players if they entered the portal so that they can then go to the player and tell them how much money they can get them if they go into the portal. As we all know, it’s a broken system that we’re living in just hoping it can end up being rebuilt into something that resembles fair competition with less (or ideally no) corruption.”

DPP, P4 school: “The overarching theme this cycle was a lot worse from the team standpoint than this time last year. Part of that is based on that there were fewer quality players that entered, and along with that, now that everyone has money, everyone costs a lot more. The players (are) getting way more, but from a team sense, there’s less quality. . . There are fewer good players in college football now because, when you look at the grand scheme of things, 2024 was the last year of Covid seniors. So this draft class had two-and-a-half senior classes in one. You had the high school class of 2021 that played four years without redshirting, the high school class of 2020 that played five years without redshirting, then the high school classes of 2018 and 2019 that had a redshirt plus Covid years. So, because of all that, there were so many seniors in college football with no eligibility and they’re all leaving (for the draft), so a lot of the other guys (remaining) haven’t played as much. There were fewer younger guys with meaningful stats. For the immediate time being . . . it’s gonna take some time to balance itself out (talent-wise) with younger players, but in the end, it will be relatively normal. We won’t see the kind of quality and depth that we saw in the 2023 class. With revenue sharing across college football, salaries have skyrocketed. We just won’t see the same depth that we’ve seen in the past.” 

NIL agent with established, NFLPA-certified firm: “Seeing more and more players with representation. Not surprising that this is the direction it’s headed. Agents are still clowns for the most part. Even legitimate NFL agents just don’t know what they’re doing. Still hearing a ton of complaints about that from teams. Player talent was about the same. I think G5/FCS kids think more concretely about the portal as a part of their college career plan. Most of them want to ‘level up.’ There was definitely another infusion of money with revenue share kicking in. The middle class P4s that couldn’t raise collective money competitively got a huge boost. If anything, NIL is creating more parity, at least for now.”

Top NIL agent, also with NFL certification: “From an agency perspective, I think it’s really important to highlight that there are some bigger NFL agencies that are taking NIL seriously and there are those that don’t. . . These (firms) are either hitting on the top guys, doing a ton of volume, or both. Seems like these were the names I heard from players on who had reached out. Last year, I was like one of the only shows in town. Now more medium-sized NFL agencies are getting involved in the portal. In high school, it’s more of the (top-five NFL firms) that are getting all of the top high school talent, mainly QB, skill, (pass rushers) and OT prospects. The point I want to make . . . is that if an NFL agency isn’t on the list, they are probably gonna get passed by in the next 3-5 (years). I know a lot of people are saying that players won’t stick that long, and to a degree they are correct, but I think if a player stays with his NIL guy for long enough, (the agency has) a better chance of landing them for the draft down the road.”

We’ll have more on the portal in today’s Friday Wrap. Register here.